Calling all Sovietologists …

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/mother-sues-ai-firm-and-google-alleging-chatbot-drove-teen-suicide

  • AI’s implement synthetic scripts
  • AI’s, as of this moment, show ZERO evidence of “awareness”
  • It is UNLIKELY that an AI could drive someone to suicide UNLESS that person is close to doing it AND feeding the AI (GIGO) with their own projected depressed sadness

An AI might be used as a trolling process, but it’s entirely likely that ONCE the kids are engaged, the chat sessions are handed off to EVIL pieces of shit that pay for the privilege to do THIS and worse to kids.

AI’s can’t do this, and there is more to this story … I think …

LAUNDERING PEOPLE

What if you can launder lies or deceptions or fake people the same way you launder money?

A lot of things get posed as “A or B” – there’s no “C”. Is that an accident?

You see Alex Jones debating some fool on CNN regarding gun control, and Jones looks bat shit crazy … was that the purpose? – or was the purpose to introduce a simple idea “Alex Jones is real and he represents the opposition”?

When you approach a “news” story, do you ask the question: WHY am I SEEING THIS? Do you assume there is a “free press” where anything that can be randomly observed and discussed is reported? Or are stories curated? Even the puff-pieces, the bleed-leads … curated.

You are allowed to enter the room. The room has writing on the wall that can ONLY be read with a black light. If you turn on the black light, the light turns on. If you turn off the light to make the room dark, the black light turns off. We can have discussions about the wiring and the room, and we can even have conversations about the teleology or PURPOSE of the room, but we can’t and don’t have the basis for a conversation that justifies the “room” as a real place worthy of inspection beyond that of the prisoner inspecting their cell.

I re-watched the Jon Ronson series “The Men Who Stare at Goats” recently, and there was a movie with Ewan MacGregor made about this. It’s worth watching, like the film “Mirage Men”, to get an overview of how mind control and military psychological warfare work.

In the Ronson series there are characters who pop up, and at one point COL Alexander is correcting Ronson one WHO stopped the heart of a goat. And Alexander points him at Guy Savelli, and Savelli seems like a grifter … he has a VHS tape or he doesn’t, he makes up stories about hamsters in a cage. He never produced a video showing him kill a goat or a hamster, but if you watch the documentary and sense the tension in Ronson’s well practiced speech, you are left with: Guy Savelli is real, a person, don’t question that. But I wonder, why did my instincts tell me when I first saw this guy that he seemed manufactured, constructed.

This is a bit of a ramble, and perhaps the reasoning isn’t quite there.

My point is simple: sometimes the purpose of the propaganda or manipulation or trauma-monkey or PSYOP isn’t so much about the superficial message, sometimes it’s purpose is far simpler: to introduce a fake thing as real.

BTW: this is part of the metaphysics of sheep dipping.

And why sheep-dogs are critical. Alex Jones, Tucker, etc …

The sheep dogs guard the boundary between what is fake and what is real, and they give you some stuff that seems real … but they toss that stuff back in the paddock of the FAKE.

(like the weird room above)

The goals of storytelling …

“The core goal of all storytelling is to GET PEOPLE to incorporate the narrative into their own memory.” – Dr. Freckles

“A secondary goal of storytelling is to get people to RE-TELL the story, thus spreading its effect.” – Dr. Freckles

Think about the APOLLO MOON story …

No matter what you believe about it, it gets embellished on, facts change, people even make up stories around the event that are not true …

“I was HERE when it happened …”, kind of like the “JFK” I was here stories …

The retelling of the story naturally mutates it … but more so, the MEDIA PUMP around the story gives it heat and permanence outside the scope of human memory, and becomes a MEME in the context of culture. I guess.

It does become a retained memory.

My dad told me a story once, when I was a kid, about some dude that was running his car on water – it was the 1970’s, and we were sandwiched between two OIL SHOCKS …

Then, when I was 11 or 12, I heard a similar story on KOMO 1000 AM Paul Harvey …

And it’s hard to say for certain how the story spreads or who spreads it, but it can spread on its own if its the RIGHT story.

Now think about COVID …

Paragliders …

The HERO STORY of ASSANGE …

George Floyd …

You ever wonder WHY they are doing all these derivative remakes in the movies and pop culture? – Because if you see it from the right angle, it looks like concertina wire around the collective unconscious.

Do I believe it’s “all lies”? – no …

Do I think you need to be a talented Sovietologist to see through most of it? – yes.

Am I good at it? – sometimes.

The hardest thing to overcome is wishful thinking …

What makes a good story a GREAT STORY? – it’s a story you WANT to believe, and probably NEED to believe.