What is pushed?

I’m thinking about my next computer project, and I’m tempted to build a narrative analyzer. Basically, LLM trained on “news” headlines from RSS feeds with the purpose of identifying key trends, focus, placement.

They say “no press is bad press”, and this is still true and maybe a hint.

If you’re into predictive programming … (next up: “accidental nuclear war” ???)

  1. Russians attacking CIA/MOSSAD proxies in Syria: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russian-jets-support-syrian-counteroffensive-after-jihadist-insurgents-capture-aleppo
  2. ZELENSKY OFFERS PEACE FOR NATO MEMBERSHIP: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/zelenskyy-offers-end-hot-phase-war-exchange-nato-membership
  3. A 100K man NATO ARMY for the Ukraine: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russias-foreign-intelligence-service-warned-about-100k-strong-nato-intervention
  4. PUTIN WARNS TRUMP about MOAR MCPOYLES and REVEALS his wonder-weapons (like Hitler): https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/putin-sends-chilling-warning-to-trump-over-his-safety-as-he-threatens-kyiv-with-oreshnik-missile-strike-101732841021860.html

Nice set up for a story.

This was an HBO movie from 1990: “By Dawn’s Early Light”.

Not a bad film, but the premise is accidental or triggered accidental nuclear war. This is also the premise of the story SUM of ALL FEARS.

In fact, I can’t think of many FUCKING nuclear war MOVIES that didn’t have as an aspect or premise ACCIDENTAL nuclear war: On The Beach, DR. STRANGELOVE, FAILSAFE, DEF CON 4, etc … etc … it’s robots or faulty wiring or some random “McPoyle” with too much clearance. Accidental has been a key message of the nuke war narrative during my lifetime. Almost like the “pandemic” thing, you could guess that THIS might be (along with Blue Beam) a possible “covid” scale psyop.

COVID SCALE PSYOPS:

  1. “Alien Attack” (Blue Beam)
  2. “Accidental” nuclear war (or on purpose)
  3. “NATURAL” EVENT: some natural catastrophe that is triggered
  4. “COVID” (monkey-herpes) PART 2, electric fucking boogaloo …

SCENARIOS in order of likelihood:

  1. Accidental nuke war scenario: seems most likely since 2022
  2. Blue Beam
  3. Natural Event: pick one
  4. Another COVID (everyone loves remakes)

KEEP IN MIND: you can’t really “fake” a nuclear war, if you could they would have done it already. You can fake the reasons, and limit the damage.

  • limited nuclear war: means next stage super globalism OR the END TIMES, JD VANCE gets revealed? (iykyk)
  • full scale nuclear war: means ZARDOZ STYLE outcomes, safe zones for the wealthy, massive depopulation for the rest of us … massively painful

Do I think someone could trigger a nuclear war? – yes. But you’d have to have the set up first, which means the US would already have to be near a state of full scale war with the nation in question. Russia is the only nation that matches these criteria. I started warning friends, families, listeners, about this scenario 10 fucking years ago – IDGAF what happens now. I just hope I get taken out in the first wave: whether it’s limited or full scale. I don’t want my friends or family to get hurt, so that does complicate things ethically.

BUT PER THE SCRIPT? – are they going to make it look like Russia nuked Donetsk, and unlike in the film do WE (NATO) play the decaying empire this time?

LAUNDERING PEOPLE

What if you can launder lies or deceptions or fake people the same way you launder money?

A lot of things get posed as “A or B” – there’s no “C”. Is that an accident?

You see Alex Jones debating some fool on CNN regarding gun control, and Jones looks bat shit crazy … was that the purpose? – or was the purpose to introduce a simple idea “Alex Jones is real and he represents the opposition”?

When you approach a “news” story, do you ask the question: WHY am I SEEING THIS? Do you assume there is a “free press” where anything that can be randomly observed and discussed is reported? Or are stories curated? Even the puff-pieces, the bleed-leads … curated.

You are allowed to enter the room. The room has writing on the wall that can ONLY be read with a black light. If you turn on the black light, the light turns on. If you turn off the light to make the room dark, the black light turns off. We can have discussions about the wiring and the room, and we can even have conversations about the teleology or PURPOSE of the room, but we can’t and don’t have the basis for a conversation that justifies the “room” as a real place worthy of inspection beyond that of the prisoner inspecting their cell.

I re-watched the Jon Ronson series “The Men Who Stare at Goats” recently, and there was a movie with Ewan MacGregor made about this. It’s worth watching, like the film “Mirage Men”, to get an overview of how mind control and military psychological warfare work.

In the Ronson series there are characters who pop up, and at one point COL Alexander is correcting Ronson one WHO stopped the heart of a goat. And Alexander points him at Guy Savelli, and Savelli seems like a grifter … he has a VHS tape or he doesn’t, he makes up stories about hamsters in a cage. He never produced a video showing him kill a goat or a hamster, but if you watch the documentary and sense the tension in Ronson’s well practiced speech, you are left with: Guy Savelli is real, a person, don’t question that. But I wonder, why did my instincts tell me when I first saw this guy that he seemed manufactured, constructed.

This is a bit of a ramble, and perhaps the reasoning isn’t quite there.

My point is simple: sometimes the purpose of the propaganda or manipulation or trauma-monkey or PSYOP isn’t so much about the superficial message, sometimes it’s purpose is far simpler: to introduce a fake thing as real.

BTW: this is part of the metaphysics of sheep dipping.

And why sheep-dogs are critical. Alex Jones, Tucker, etc …

The sheep dogs guard the boundary between what is fake and what is real, and they give you some stuff that seems real … but they toss that stuff back in the paddock of the FAKE.

(like the weird room above)