So important, you at STARBUCKS with it …

“If you will shoot a man for stealing your laptop, WTAF you doing using a STARBUCKS network or cell tower connect?” – Dr. Freckles

(don’t get me started on remote bluetooth hijacking, and other close attack hacking tools, a lot of hackers troll starbucks and other coffee shops with this shit)

BETTER THAN THE TROLLEY PROBLEM …

ASSUMPTION: you are in a grid-down scenario. No electricity, no food at the grocery store, no radio or TV signals for 2 weeks and you, and your family, are running out of food. It’s been 4 weeks since the blackout begun which triggered this.

What are your moral thresholds for:

  1. lying and cheating
  2. stealing/looting
  3. fighting
  4. arson
  5. killing

figure it out

THERE ARE TWO TYPES:

  1. Responders: react quickly with limited information
  2. Ponderers: react slowly with limited information

Ceteris paribus: a responder VS a ponderer wins in any random 1-on-1 conflict. Being willing to ACT always beats inaction, or almost always.

GROUPS OF PEOPLE have ZERO moral threshold issues or compunction about using violence given distributed guilt/responsibility dynamics in the group.

DROP SHIPPING

Them: “I love free enterprise.”

Also them: “I don’t like drop shipping.”

Also also them: “Wow, WWW makes starting a business so easy!”

also also also them: “Boy, I hate drop shippers …”