What if you can launder lies or deceptions or fake people the same way you launder money?
A lot of things get posed as “A or B” – there’s no “C”. Is that an accident?
You see Alex Jones debating some fool on CNN regarding gun control, and Jones looks bat shit crazy … was that the purpose? – or was the purpose to introduce a simple idea “Alex Jones is real and he represents the opposition”?
When you approach a “news” story, do you ask the question: WHY am I SEEING THIS? Do you assume there is a “free press” where anything that can be randomly observed and discussed is reported? Or are stories curated? Even the puff-pieces, the bleed-leads … curated.
You are allowed to enter the room. The room has writing on the wall that can ONLY be read with a black light. If you turn on the black light, the light turns on. If you turn off the light to make the room dark, the black light turns off. We can have discussions about the wiring and the room, and we can even have conversations about the teleology or PURPOSE of the room, but we can’t and don’t have the basis for a conversation that justifies the “room” as a real place worthy of inspection beyond that of the prisoner inspecting their cell.
I re-watched the Jon Ronson series “The Men Who Stare at Goats” recently, and there was a movie with Ewan MacGregor made about this. It’s worth watching, like the film “Mirage Men”, to get an overview of how mind control and military psychological warfare work.
In the Ronson series there are characters who pop up, and at one point COL Alexander is correcting Ronson one WHO stopped the heart of a goat. And Alexander points him at Guy Savelli, and Savelli seems like a grifter … he has a VHS tape or he doesn’t, he makes up stories about hamsters in a cage. He never produced a video showing him kill a goat or a hamster, but if you watch the documentary and sense the tension in Ronson’s well practiced speech, you are left with: Guy Savelli is real, a person, don’t question that. But I wonder, why did my instincts tell me when I first saw this guy that he seemed manufactured, constructed.
This is a bit of a ramble, and perhaps the reasoning isn’t quite there.
My point is simple: sometimes the purpose of the propaganda or manipulation or trauma-monkey or PSYOP isn’t so much about the superficial message, sometimes it’s purpose is far simpler: to introduce a fake thing as real.
BTW: this is part of the metaphysics of sheep dipping.
And why sheep-dogs are critical. Alex Jones, Tucker, etc …
The sheep dogs guard the boundary between what is fake and what is real, and they give you some stuff that seems real … but they toss that stuff back in the paddock of the FAKE.
(like the weird room above)